Case Study
Kermanshah Industrial University Petroleum Faculty
A 1,000 m² educational-building facade where glass connection details had to tolerate relative movement between the primary structure and brittle facade panels.
Verified scope: structural glass facade, connection-detail coordination, support tolerance control, and installation checks.
Case Study
Project snapshot
Project challenge
The petroleum-faculty building required structural glass facade connections that could tolerate relative movement in the primary structure and reduce the risk of transferring displacement into brittle glass panels.
- Separating facade behavior from uncontrolled structural movement
- Coordinating glass support tolerances before installation
- Maintaining facade alignment across a 1,000 m² surface
- Reducing stress transfer into glass units
Engineering decision
SIPANEL engineered connection details to accommodate displacement between the building structure and glass facade while preserving facade alignment.
The engineering decision was to separate glass performance from uncontrolled structural movement by using connection details that reduce stress transfer into the panels.
A structural glass facade approach was used because the faculty building required a transparent architectural envelope with carefully controlled support interfaces.
Support points, glass unit alignment, and connection tolerances were coordinated with the primary structure before installation.
Execution detail
Installation sequence
Execution covered approximately 1,000 m² of glass facade with attention to connection alignment, support tolerances, and controlled installation of glass units.
Procurement control
Glass units, connection accessories, and support components were coordinated against the approved facade layout to reduce mismatch during installation.
Coordination with site team
The site team checked support references before setting glass units so connection tolerances remained within the intended installation sequence.
Quality checkpoints
- Connection-detail review before installation
- Support tolerance and glass alignment inspection
- Facade continuity check across the installed surface
Measured result
Risks controlled before publication
Glass breakage under structural movement
Connection details were used to reduce direct stress transfer from the primary structure into glass panels.
Facade connection failure
Support points and tolerances were reviewed before glass installation.
Mismatch between structure and glass facade
Facade alignment was coordinated against the primary-structure references.
Reduced building-user safety
Movement-aware detailing reduced the risk of brittle facade-panel damage from structural displacement.
Related Case Studies
32-Bed Military Hospital
Raz & Jargalan, North Khorasan, Iran
- Challenge
- During the COVID-19 emergency, a fully operational 32-bed military hospital was needed from excavation to readiness in under 50 days, requiring full EPC coordination.
- Engineering decision
- Engineering teams coordinated full EPC delivery — from excavation and structural construction to sandwich panel envelope, internal partitions, and final readiness — within an emergency timeline.
- Result
- A fully operational 32-bed military hospital was delivered from excavation to readiness in less than 50 days during the COVID-19 emergency.
Ahvaz Airport Passenger Terminal
Ahvaz, Iran
- Challenge
- The passenger terminal included a curved front architectural feature where the covering had to bend in a perpendicular direction. That made geometry control, substructure alignment, aluminium panel layout, ZIP-TECH transitions, and final visual quality the main execution risks.
- Engineering decision
- The engineering decision was to control geometry first: define curved references, coordinate panel and roofing interfaces, then execute the covering without interrupting the architectural line.
- Result
- 4,000 m² of ZIP-TECH and aluminium cladding were executed while preserving the curved architectural form and final visual quality.
Mehrabad Aircraft Hangar
Tehran, Iran
- Challenge
- The hangar application required accurate sandwich panel covering over a continuous curved structure. Installation access, panel alignment, substructure coordination, and roof-wall transitions all affected weather protection and visual continuity.
- Engineering decision
- Engineering teams defined installation references from the hangar geometry, coordinated support points, and reviewed transition details before site installation.
- Result
- A 5,000 m² sandwich panel covering was executed while maintaining the continuous curved form of the aircraft hangar.
Mahshahr Taxi Parking Facility
Bandar Mahshahr, Khuzestan, Iran
- Challenge
- The parking facility needed a durable sandwich panel roof for a high-use transport environment in Bandar Mahshahr. The useful engineering challenge was not only panel supply; it was keeping rainwater movement predictable through slopes, gutters, flashings, downspouts, and sealed transitions in a coastal climate.
- Engineering decision
- The engineering decision was to treat drainage as part of the roof system instead of a later accessory. Slopes, water-flow paths, gutter locations, and panel alignment were coordinated before installation.
- Result
- A 4,000 m² sandwich panel roofing system was delivered with coordinated rainwater management and controlled weather-protection detailing.
Need a facade connection review?
Send facade drawings and support details so SIPANEL engineering can review connection logic, tolerances, and installation sequencing.